Washington Post
Review: by Lisa Zeidner
This review was
overall positive. She liked how Harris involved factual information along with
personal stories to get his point across. Along with this she agrees that we
are approaching the end of absence but she wasn’t to keen about the part where
he went without Internet for a month.
National Post Review:
by Shannon Tien
This review was also
overall positive. She really liked that Harris provided a dozen or so of his
own absence experiences. This is a way for him relate to his audience but then push
the question back on his readers asking us “how will you live?” Similar to the first
review, she is a little put off by the fact that Harris separates himself from
his readers by the fact that he went 31 days without the Internet.
The Wall Street
Journal: by Jessica Kasmer-Jacobs
This review seems a lot
less positive then the other two but more so neutral then negative. It simply
states what Harris talked about in his book and the information he used. The
writing style is very clear cut and no praise is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment